Arkansas

  Securities Attorneys.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
July 20, 2010
Securities
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Securities News

 


Statement of the Securities and Exchange Commission Concerning Financial Penalties


Washington, D.C., Jan. 4, 2006 – The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission today issued the following statement concerning financial penalties:

Today the Commission announced the filing of two settled actions against corporate issuers, SEC v. McAfee, Inc. and In the Matter of Applix, Inc. In one, the company will pay a civil money penalty; in the other, a penalty is not part of the settlement.

The question of whether, and if so to what extent, to impose civil penalties against a corporation raises significant questions for our mission of investor protection. The authority to impose such penalties is relatively recent in the Commission’s history, and the use of very large corporate penalties is more recent still. Recent cases have not produced a clear public view of when and how the Commission will use corporate penalties, and within the Commission itself a variety of views have heretofore been expressed, but not reconciled.

The Commission believes it important to provide the maximum possible degree of clarity, consistency, and predictability in explaining the way that its corporate penalty authority will be exercised. To this end, we are issuing this statement describing with particularity the framework for our penalty determinations in these two cases. We have issued these decisions, and this statement of principles, unanimously.

In determining whether or not to impose penalties against the corporations in these cases, we carefully considered our statutory authority, and the legislative history surrounding that statutory authority.

In 1990, Congress passed the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act (the “Remedies Act”), which gave the Commission authority generally to seek civil money penalties in enforcement cases.1 The penalty provisions added by the Remedies Act expressly authorize the Commission to obtain money penalties from entities, including corporate issuers. These provisions also enhanced the Commission’s authority to fine individuals. Today, we limit our discussion to penalties against corporations, although we view penalties against individual offenders as a critical component in punishing and deterring violative conduct.

Contact our Arkansas Securities Lawyer Now!

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
Variation Margin: Payment made on a daily or intraday basis
Variation Margin: Payment made on a daily or intraday basis by a clearing member to the clearing organization based on adverse price movement in positions carried by the clearing member, calculated separately for customer and proprietary positions.

 


  Securities News  
 


Latest news about securities cases in Arkansas and nationwide:

SEC Charges Family With $3.7 Million Insider Trading Scheme
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the filing of a civil action in federal district court in New York, New York involving a ram...
Read more >


Pump & Dump.con: Tips for Avoiding Stock Scams on the Internet
One of the most common Internet frauds involves the classic "pump and dump" scheme. Here's how it works: A company's web site may feature a glowing...
Read more >


Files Securities Fraud Charges Against Computer
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced securities fraud charges against Computer Associates International, Inc. and three of the co...
Read more >


More Securities News >

 
 

Securities Terms

 


Tuesday's Term

Accrued interest

Definition:
Interest deemed to be earned on a security but not yet paid to the investor.

Hedge Exemption

Definition:
An exemption from speculative position limits for bona fide hedgers and certain other persons who meet the requirements of exchange and CFTC rules.

Artificial Price

Definition:
A futures price that has been affected by a manipulation and is thus higher or lower than it would have been if it reflected the forces of supply and demand.

More Securities Terms >

 

Securities Resources

 


Search Securities resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Securities Hot Topics

 
Topics Related to Securities:

  • Investment Fraud
  • Stock Fraud
  • Bond Fraud
  • Mutual Fund Fraud

More Securities Topics >

Arkansas Securities Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an securities attorney you should contact our Securities Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Batesville
  • Benton
  • Bentonville
  • Blytheville
  • Cabot
  • Camden
  • Conway
  • El Dorado
  • Fayetteville
  • Forrest City
  • Fort Smith
  • Harrison
  • Hot Springs National P
  • Jacksonville
  • Jonesboro
  • Little Rock
  • Magnolia
  • Mountain Home
  • North Little Rock
  • Paragould
  • Pine Bluff
  • Rogers
  • Searcy
  • Sherwood
  • Springdale
  • Texarkana
  • Van Buren
  • West Memphis
  • White Hall
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on Arkansas Securities Attorneys.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.